Home / Physics / General Physics / Quantum Physics

How quantum weirdness is improving electron microscopes

phys.org
4 min read
fairly difficult
Quantum weirdness is opening new doors for electron microscopes, powerful tools used for high-resolution imaging.
A scanning electron microscope at the UO's CAMCOR facility. Physicist Ben McMorran and his team have come up with a way to improve the performance of the research tool. Credit: University of Oregon



Two new advances from the lab of UO physicist Ben McMorran are refining the microscopes. Both come from taking advantage of a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: that an electron can behave simultaneously like a wave and a particle. It's one of many examples of weird, quantum-level quirks in which subatomic particles often behave in ways that seem to violate the laws of classical physics.

One of the studies finds a way to study an object under the microscope without making contact with it, preventing the scope from damaging fragile samples. And the second devises a way to make two measurements on a sample at once, giving a way to study how particles in that object are potentially interacting across distances.

McMorran and his colleagues report their findings in two papers, both published in the journal Physical Review Letters.

"It's often difficult to observe something without influencing it, especially when you're looking at details," McMorran said. "Quantum physics appears to provide a way for us to look at things more without disrupting them."

Electron microscopes are used to get close-up views of proteins and cells as well as nonbiological samples, like new kinds of materials. Instead of light used in more traditional microscopes, electron microscopes focus a beam of electrons at a sample. As the beam interacts with the sample, some of its characteristics change. A detector measures the changes to the beam, which then get translated into a high-resolution image.

But that powerful electron beam can cause damage to fragile structures in the sample. Over…
Laurel Hamers
Read full article