The uncomfortable truths hidden inside the Ahmaud Arbery verdict
6 min read
Many are celebrating the conviction of the 25-year-old's killers. But legal scholars warn white vigitalism remains a very real threat.
While legal scholars say the system worked as intended — this time — many hope the trial of the three white men convicted of killing Ahmaud Arbery will place greater attention to the entire judicial process, not just policing.

Travis and Greg McMichael, a father and son, along with their neighbor, William "Roddie" Bryan, were convicted Wednesday on 23 of 27 counts, including all nine charged to Travis. He fired the fatal shots at close range after the trio pursued Arbery through their suburban Georgia neighborhood.

The encounter was partially recorded on cell phone video captured by Bryan.

"This was a lynching in broad daylight that would have been perfectly okay," said Justin Hansford, a Howard University law professor. "If it wasn't for video footage and protests, these people would have walked scot-free."

Defense attorneys for the McMichaels argued their clients had a duty to protect their neighborhood and were within their legal right to detain Arbery citing a Civil War-era citizen's arrest law, which was repealed earlier this year.

The white men, suspecting Arbery was behind a string of burglaries in the area, pursued him as he jogged through Satilla Shores, a neighborhood outside Brunswick, Ga. On the day of the encounter no one witnessed him doing anything nefarious and he was unarmed.

Still, a defense lawyer told jurors Travis McMichael was justified in using lethal force because his client feared for his life when he and Arbery tussled over the shotgun. McMichael said he was trying to avoid violence when he pointed the weapon in Arbery's direction as a "show of force" to "deescalate" the situation.

The jury did not buy it, convicting the younger McMichael with the most serious charge: malice murder, the deliberate intention to kill someone.

"The defendants never witnessed a crime. They have no immediate knowledge of a crime. Mr. Arbery was not an aggressor. He hadn't committed a felony," said Ira Robbins, a professor at American University…
Brakkton Booker
Read full article